艺术在朱小地身上已然是一种本能激情,一种不会因为任何干扰而退缩的激情。大概是因为他的职业角色以及在建筑设计上的一些成就,引发了人们对他认知的先入之见。事实上,作为一位建筑师,艺术始终内含在朱小地的职业生涯中。进一步说,广义上的艺术的学科分类给我们界定了一种永久性的分裂,以致于我们陷入自律性的学科知识结构中无法脱身,这也是我们产生对朱小地身份困惑的根本原因所在,他是一位艺术家,还是一位建筑师?连同朱小地自身创作发展的思考困惑亦是如此,是水墨创作的研究,还是依托水墨表达自身?是以装置陈述思考,还是依托装置揭示或建构空间的意义?还有,建筑是物质技术手段创造的人工环境,还是思想立场的价值物化?……朱小地,在职业设计与艺术创作一系列的交叉探索与追问中,寻找建筑、水墨、装置、空间、自我、思想、文化之间的阈限与重叠,并试图在日渐彻底分裂的自律性知识、语言和价值中重构其先验的一致性。
朱小地水墨——存在主义式的自证
朱小地最先的艺术创作是从水墨开始的。自幼的传统学习与中国2005年后兴起的当代水墨风潮,自然的将他带入了水墨创作的摸索路径。然而,无论是传统的摹写,还是当代水墨实验中的出奇效果与观念表达,都无法满足朱小地对自我的确认。寻找自我,归根结底是现代人存在主义式的自证。
多年的建筑学学习,养成朱小地缜密的思维方式,随着他思考的深入以及对创作媒介的研究,他的水墨创作也越来越鲜明的带着其思维的理性特点并形成异于他人的个人样式。如同大历史发展中,每一次生产工具的改良带来的革新和进步一样,朱小地自己改良了毛笔,脱离笔墨纸先前的某种属性上的束缚以达到可以控制的表达上的自由,并最终成为他自己。
《2017》系列作品几乎就是朱小地这一年很长的一段时光中的日常意识轨迹。作品纸面既呈现出像印刷一样工整的序列烙迹,又带有偶然的墨渍肌理,既散发出如同锻造的金属般的质感光泽,又时见平面中的空间结构。可以说《2017》系列作品,是朱小地个人克制、理智、逻辑的思维显影,却投射出了这个印刷与工业时代的特征表象,还隐喻着按部就班枯乏人生中的偶然际遇。
朱小地空间装置——“被说出来”的思想
朱小地的装置作品,通常与建筑有密切关系,他关注材料和结构,但又不仅仅如此,如《方块字》、《竹•钢》、《斗四藻井》、《庙雨》等。这些装置作品还带着朱小地深深的文化焦虑:世界已然发生了变化,无论是绘画还是建筑,老路已经不通,但也不能沿用风格择优的“折衷主义”,一味的西方现代主义、后现代主义的亦步亦趋是否又白白暴殄传统的精华?朱小地在他的装置作品中或多或少的表达他的忧思。这种忧思在《庙雨》中被推向了高峰。朱小地在未来可能会被改造的北京旧城的一座元代大庙里,用透明的玻璃丝线连接了屋顶的梁柱与地面,它的尺度是整座建筑的高度,一根根、一排排的精准的分割出大庙的空间,形成优美又生动的“庙雨”,这样,朱小地透过现代技术美学的手段引出历史美学的发现,隐匿在这座传统建筑背后的美、结构、技术及意义就“被说出来了”。这些“被说出来”的东西有力的支撑传统建筑的美学意蕴,传递出朱小地对历史址物的价值态度。
2017年,在3画廊举办《容迹——朱小地个展》,艺术家又一次以画廊教堂空间为沉思冥想对象,实施了新的装置作品“容迹”。他用一根根3毫米直径的黑线均匀排列构成相互穿插的不同的面,从而将高阔的教堂空间衍生出“层”,光在其间穿越,形成或光明或黑暗的对比,使隐喻显灵:这个叫做“教堂”的空间并不真正有过宗教使命,它原本是一个锅炉房,担负着国有工业繁荣时期北京塑料三厂所有厂区的“供暖”职责,也曾在企业转型之后成为弃之一旁的冷清运动场。出于对在上的绝对意义的追求与仰望,艺术的介入,有着14米挑高穹顶的锅炉房,成为在3画廊的实验性场所“教堂空间”,成为冷冰冰现代生活中的人类精神“供暖”处。告别上帝,处于现代性历史之中的我们,整个世界观唯一受到实证科学的支配,难免不被“实用”与“实利”的虚假繁荣所迷惑,而回避对于人真正有决定性价值的思考与问题。在这样的一个时代,不用于生活与生产的实验性艺术空间,成为了我们名符其实的精神倚靠的“教堂”。
朱小地这一类型装置作品如同行走在空间、建筑与思想传达的刀锋边缘,深入到技术、语言、历史裂缝之间的“意义填补”。如果以一种预先霸占我们认知系统的眼光来看,这些装置既无法成立为一个建筑设计作品,离开了实施的空间也不能独立言说,那么就很容易沦为无多意义的布景手段。然而,朱小地却甘愿置身于危机,在转化的材料与技术的褶皱间将藏匿于现实世界中的不明之物暴露出来,于边界处呈现不期而遇的东西。这便是“思想的物化”!而这种触发边界断裂处的实验与探索之所以能够生效,其原因在于世界本质上的无限性,需要艺术家不断的使表面分离的碎片相互撞击并且对早先的界限始终存疑。
围绕画廊而建的“广场”——分享社会价值与文化目标
在《容迹》的展览中,出于创作的激情本能和完美主义的要求,朱小地还重新定义了在3画廊的外部空间,在隔着厚厚玻璃门外杂芜的草地上创造了“广场”。“广场”保留了原来空间的工业遗留物——钢铁管道,把门口杂草与花木共生的园子平整为水泥广场,使得画廊的外部空间形成了一个公共的领域,具有原来小园子没有的开放性和容纳性,意味着之前老的、狭隘的系统的解体。对于一个建筑师来说,建筑既是一个充盈着隐匿意义的实存之物,建筑还是政治。现代的建筑师比以往的建筑师更依赖集体的赞助,不管这种赞助是来自国家、政府还是商业机构。因此,建筑师的每一次设计实践不得不是妥协与挑战并存的。这势必不能满足朱小地“思想物化”的乌托邦创想快感,也势必不能袒露个人的真实政治诉求。我无意于揣测朱小地的政治追求和渴望,但是“广场”的出现的确为我们分享了开放与公共的社会价值以及长远的文化目标。
“广场”,将画廊作为历史、经济、行政和其他制度的种种空间特质揭示出来。在3画廊本来身处于一个废弃的旧厂房区,它由工业建筑改造而成,在某种程度上代表着从工业时代到知识经济时代的更迭。而作为资本主义市场经济中的一部分,艺术画廊因其拥有大量珍贵作品而被视为一种高高在上且与大众社会隔膜的奢侈品仓库。“广场”把艺术的价值随之衍生出去,意味着艺术从而进入了一个普遍意义的新天地。
整个“广场”也贯穿着时间和历史的痕迹,重新整合了艺术对于人的价值。当人们走进“广场”,实际上也走进了一件艺术作品的内部,艺术与人的现代关系交代明晰。这种关系既不再是一种灵媒关系,也不再是一种把玩与崇拜的关系,而是“进入”的关系。而这件作品也是不能够被收藏,以束之高阁的,它因反思画廊体制而产生并且始终围绕画廊而产生意义。
结语
朱小地的艺术创作,处处是他个人的意识与思想痕迹。在他的身上始终葆有着传统精英的胸怀抱负和作为意识,一方面看重传统的价值,另一方面展望于现代性高地。在这样一个全球化时代语境与当下中国背景下,朱小地的发问是以直达先验统一性为策略核心的。无论是对于一个国家,还是艺术家自己,创造,只有打破自己的意识形态大坝,才可能真正确立自我。而这种先验的统一性,在西方文化中要上溯到超越在上的上帝,在中国文化要上溯到先天地而生的“道”。
朱小地持续不断的追求、探索,试图移开领域界定的障碍石头,触及源头,这出自于他内心的超越渴望,也源于现实的复杂社会处境。只有在权力系统内部的人才能更真切的认识权力机制。无论是生活的教导,还是历史上前辈的命运启示(比如一忽儿被批判为“资产阶级唯心主义、复古主义”的梁思成,一忽儿主张“现代建筑”的人又在反右运动中遭受迫害)。历史的难题在于随着社会的更迭变迁,载体本身总是面对不同命运。无论是绘画还是装置,乃至建筑,朱小地在找寻一种超越现实纠葛,藏于在实存之中,笼罩在天地之间的东西。艺术创作,不得不说是朱小地在不断建构的乌托邦诉求。
文嘉琳
2017年11月15日 于厦地
Zhu Xiaodi was born with a passion for art that has not abated throughout his life. We think we know Zhu Xiaodi because of his achievement in architectural design; however, his art practice has existed throughout his professional career. What adds to this confusion is that any rigid concept of the art creates a permanent split between professional design and creative endeavor, so those who are caught between these distinct knowledge structures and intellectual disciplines are not “allowed” dual identities. This is the primary cause of the confusion surrounding Zhu Xiaodi 's identity - is he an artist, or an architect? This has also confused Zhu Xiaodi himself. Is it a study of ink painting, or self-expression through ink painting? Should his work be interpreted from the point of view of installation art, or as using installation to reveal the meaning of the construction of space? Also, is building an artificial environment the creation of a material technology, or the materialization of an ideological stance? In the discovery process across design and art, Zhu Xiaodi is searching for the threshold, where architecture, ink painting, space, self, ideology, and culture overlap. He attempts to reconstruct the empirical consistency of his knowledge, language, and values within his differing practices.
Zhu Xiaodi’s Ink Work — Existential Proof of the Self
Zhu Xiaodi learned about Chinese traditional culture from a young age, and began his creative art practice with ink painting. From 2005 onward, his exploration process with ink painting was followed by a wave of experimentation in contemporary Chinese ink. His desire for self-authentication was never satisfied, whether through traditional reproduction of calligraphic form or the surprise results that were rooted in the concepts and experimentation of contemporary ink painting. After all, a search for the inner self is existential quest of the modern man.
After years studying architecture, Zhu Xiaodi developed the habit of careful thinking. Together, his in-depth research of the medium meant his ink work gradually began to embody his distinctly rational thinking, which then formed his unique style. Throughout history, every innovation and improvement of the tool pushed the revolutionary progress of the medium. In the same way, Zhu Xiaodi remade his own brush. His freedom of expression was born while breaking through the conventional property of brush, ink, and paper.
The series 《2017/01-2017/09》 tracks Zhu Xiaodi 's daily mindfulness over the course of a year; the surface of the paper is presented not only through neat and orderly print, but also by the accidental ink textures that appear. This series embodies the spatial structure of the plane, through the quality of metallic luster. Moreover,《2017/01-2017/09》highlights Zhu Xiaodi's self-control – his rational, and logical thinking. The work not only projects the presentational feature of printing in the industrial era, but also functions as a metaphor for the spontaneous opportunities discovered in routine life.
Zhu Xiaodi's installation work -the thought that “being said"
Zhu Xiaodi 's installation work is closely related to architecture, as it pays great attention to material and structure, illustrated in his works《Block character》、
《bamboo, Steel》、and《Temple, rain》. These installations reflect his deep cultural anxiety; as the world has changed, so architecture and art have had to move forward. We cannot follow eclecticism however, as to blindly follow the path of Western modernism and postmodernism, vilifies the essence of Eastern tradition. Zhu Xiaodi’s anxiety was pushed to its limit in his installation work《Temple, rain》. In the future, Zhu Xiaodi may reconstruct a Yuan Dynasty temple in the old city of Beijing, using transparent glass wire to connect the bean-column and ground. The scale of the wires is the height of the entire building. With the wires precisely dividing the space of the Great Temple, the space transforms into a beautiful and vivid "Temple Rain". Through the methods of modern technology, Zhu Xiaodi offers a discovery of historical aesthetics, highlighting the beauty, structure, technology, and meaning of this traditional building. The aesthetic implications of traditional architecture are explicitly supported, conveying Zhu Xiaodi 's attitude towards the value of historical buildings.
The Exhibition 《Unlimited》 is Zhu Xiaodi 's solo show, which will be held at the Being 3 gallery, in 2017. Once again, the artist uses the gallery space “church” as a meditation object in the creation of this new installation,《unlimited》. He evenly arranges 3mm black strings, interspersed with each other, to form different surfaces. In this sense, the church space will be divided into different planes. The light will be projected throughout these surfaces in order to create a contrast of light and shade, making the metaphor visible. On the other hand, this "Church" does not have a religious mission. It was originally a boiler room used for “heating" Beijing #3 plastic factory during the height of the period of prosperity when the state-owned industry utilized the building. It then retreated to being an abandoned stadium after the end of that era. The artist’s intervention, containing the admiration for the space and pursuit of its absolute meaning, transformed the 14-meter-high boiler room into a "church space", which is an experimental area at the Being 3 gallery. It is also a “spiritual heater” for people living a cold contemporary life. Within the secular history of modernity, the outlook on the world has been dominated by empirical thinking. Confused by the false prosperity of "practicality"," people have avoided thinking about and discerning truly significant values. In such an era, an experimental art space that is not used for living and production has become a spiritual church.
Zhu Xiaodi’s installation work gives us the feeling of walking on the edge of space, architecture and thought. It fills the gap between technology, language, and history. Zhu Xiaodi transformed the material by technology, to expose the undefined objects concealed in the real world. This is the "materialization of thought". The reason the experiments and explorations that triggered the rupture of the boundary are valid, is because the world is inherently inflexible and therefore requires artists to always question its boundaries.
The "Square" built around the gallery - share social values and cultural goals
To redefine the gallery's external space, Zhu Xiaodi built a “square” in the 《Unlimited》exhibition, giving form to his instinctive passion for creation and desire for perfection. The square retained the original steel pipes - the industrial remnants of the original space. Furthermore, he flattened the garden into a plaza of cement. As a result, the gallery's external space became a public space. It therefore possesses an openness and forgivingness that the previous small garden did not have, and represents the disintegration of an old and narrow system. For an architect, the design of space is not only an existence full of hidden meaning, but is inherently political. Whether the project sponsors come from the country, government, or a commercial sector, modern architects depend now more on collective patronage than their predecessors. In their practice, the architect therefore must deal with the co-existence of compromise and challenge. This certainly cannot fulfill Zhu Xiaodi 's utopian ideal of "the materialization of thought", nor can it bare one's true political goals. I don't want to speculate on the political pursuits and aspirations of Zhu Xiaodi, however, the "square" shares the social values of openness and public space, as well as embodies our long-term cultural goals.
The "square" reveals various spatial characteristics of galleries from the perspective of history, economics, administration, and other institutions. Being 3 Gallery was originally housed in an abandoned old factory, which was remodeled from an industrial building in order to represent how the industrial age has been superseded by a knowledge economy. As part of the capitalist market economy, art galleries are regarded as luxury warehouses as they are ranked above and separated from the public, due to their large number of precious works. The art “value” derived from "Square” shows that art has embarked upon a new level of universal significance.
The entire "square" also runs through the traces of time and history, re-integrating the value of art for people. When people walk into the "square," they are walking into a piece of art. The modern relationship between people and art, are clearly defined. This relationship is no longer a kind of spiritual media, nor a relationship between play and worship, but an "entry" relationship. This piece of work cannot be collected and put on a shelf; it was built to question the gallery system, and does not make sense as an individual work.
Conclusion
Zhu Xiaodi’s artistic creation fully represents his personal awareness and thinking. People can find the melding of mind and ambition, as well as the awareness of making a difference in traditionally elite values, within his work. On one hand, he attaches importance to traditional value, and on the other hand, he focuses on the highland of modernity. Against the context of globalization and the background of China, his questioning takes transcendental unity as a core strategy. No matter whether undertaken by a country, or as the quest of an individual artist, creation can only establish its self-identity by breaking this ideological dam. Transcendental unity goes back to God in Western culture, and can be traced back to the innate Tao in Chinese culture.
Zhu Xiaodi’s persistent pursuit and exploration, as well as his attempt to remove all obstacles to the fusion of mind and spirit, identifies his reach for the source of transcendence amid the complexities of the social situations of the world. Only those inside the power system can have a real understanding of the power institution -- no matter the lessons from life or inspiration of ancestral heritage. It brings to mind, Liang Sicheng, who was criticized for advocating bourgeois idealism and retro-modernism in his early days, and was persecuted by the anti-rightist movement for adhering to modern architecture later on. The conundrum of history lies in that the messenger faces an array of varying ignorance within the vicissitudes of society. From painting, installation to architecture, Zhu Xiaodi has been seeking for something that goes beyond these disputes and uncovers in the real world the revelation of heaven and earth. It is important to point out that artistic creation, for him, is a continuous pursuit of constructing Utopia.
Wen Jialin
2017.11.15 Xiadi