2021.04.09

生命的阶梯 ——弗朗西斯•培根的艺术探索 The Ladder of Life-Francis Bacon's Artistic Exploration

弗朗西斯•培根,是一位伟大的艺术家,他的荣耀已分享全球,但对他的了解,我们才窥冰山一角。弗朗西斯•培根,我们需要且不断地需要,去认知他。

 

人们敬赏弗朗西斯•培根的艺术,这本身比较有趣。培根的横空出世,是艺术的创造张力?还是人类在不同条件下生活癖好作祟?抑或所有的一切都是上帝的“孩子气”?

 

培根本身,更像一件向世人敞开的艺术。

 

一 人生深入艺术

 

培根对艺术的依赖超越一般人的理解,犹如瘾君子对毒品的依赖,艺术链接他的每根神经,兜售他的感觉,暴露他的性事与快感。艺术,既是培根混迹SOHO区的必要通行证,也是他生命存在的体验过程。正如他自己认为的:“我觉得现代人因为了解自己是意外产物,是完全没有价值的个体,所以他们会毫无理由地玩游戏。……看看现在的艺术,他们都成了彻头彻尾的游戏。我认为事情就是这样,而吸引人的是,事情对艺术家来说越发困难啦,原因是他们必须真实地深入到游戏中去,才能获得想要的成就。”没有宗教信仰的培根,向虚无完全的奉献自己,把人生彻底深入到艺术这场游戏之中。

 

培根描述自己的一生是一堆庞大的混乱:十六岁因变装癖被中产阶级家庭驱逐,与“叔叔”在柏林酒店里厮混被抛弃后,彻底沦落到贴身男仆(可能更准确的说法是同性恋男妓)和赌徒的生活之中……培根在结识了保护人埃里克•霍尔以后,真正对绘画认真起来,也是在霍尔的引领下拓宽了艺术的视野。艺术就像培根的一根救命稻草!

 

两次世界大战的结束,迫使人类从疲惫中寻找新的出路,世俗生活取代宏大主题,艺术回归个体主位。支配艺术创作的不再是崇高趣味和终极情操,而成为一种完全的个体性表达。培根的艺术首先是依靠一种本能,把情感的暴力、扭曲的影像、私密的生活暴露在作品画面和沙龙展厅,培根撕开生活的美德面具,呈现出人性本身的弱点本质。

 

相比奥斯卡•王尔德,培根非常幸运,他无须用优雅去修饰生活,可以肆无忌惮的释放自我。培根的艺术与传奇与他的两位同性恋人有着紧密联系,他们一位是浴血而战的飞行员(也是一个十足的酒鬼),一位是混迹伦敦东区的盗窃犯。这些被世俗唾弃的家伙,既是培根生活中离不开的人物,也是他的艺术来源。在培根艺术取得关键成果的1962年伦敦泰特画展上,他的情人彼得·莱西当天远在地中海自杀;在他艺术取得辉煌成就的1971年巴黎回顾展上,情人乔治·戴尔在展览开幕的前天晚上吸毒自杀。培根前所未有的堕落放纵生活正是战后欧洲人的真实写照,他在画布上纵情对血腥的迷恋,暴力的本质、生命的残酷以及挑战伦理的限度,正好切中现代人的痛点与兴奋点。任何历史时期都不会有完美的文明,人也不是纯粹的美德奴隶,只有扩拓道德尺度才能容纳人的存在。

 

毫无疑问,我们每个人都有撕裂自己的神秘冲动,只是我们大部分人只能通过伟大的创作和别人的生活,在衣冠楚楚之间悄悄的品味嗜血的快乐。正如培根自己无比清楚的“关于爱情与疾病的悲惨体验,终究是不为人们所喜欢的,他们更喜欢以无事人的身份在一边看热闹。”培根终其一生过着混乱倒错的生活,他不惜把自我作为材料,在屡试屡爽的兴奋中成就艺术的大胆实践。

 

二 艺术深入到人之本质

 

从培根的标志作品《以钉刑图为基础的三幅人物习作》开始,他便做出决断,以此为中界线,用一个半人半兽的怪物来表现人性的悲剧。“钉刑”这一传统题材,作为一种说教故事,在过去时代艺术家的笔下,充满为人类献身的崇高感,“它就像盔甲一样保护你的各种感觉和心情”(培根 语)。人类委身一个观念世界,来逃避残酷的现实和个人的苦恼。培根却直言“钉刑”是人类对人的暴行,他竖起十字架,上面赤裸悬挂的是肉、鲜血和兽性,清算宗教意义同时,培根作品刺激人类神经,隐藏着深深的命运不安。

 

现代人面临的是一个难解的悖论境遇:一方面是理想主义、宗教和超道德的坍塌,一方面是虚无主义的死结。显然,培根不会做一个先知、圣徒、预言家,他也不会为了达到自我欺骗的目的积极制造装饰的麻醉药。他倒是越来越坚定的沉迷捕捉身边人物谜般本性,坐在马桶上的不雅状态、盥洗时的变形面容、有注射器裸体的血腥,男性交合的粗鄙……培根刷新一切,对本能自我解放,对道德毫不提升,对情欲没有美化……在笼罩着净化气氛的文明大舞台上,培根的艺术深入到人之本质。

 

从20世纪60年代开始,培根越来越倾向画肖像画。他认为艺术是生命的迷恋,而人类最迷恋的是人类自己。他的肖像画也多是描绘自己身边的人物,尽管他们总是与他们本身的表象不同。谁能够轻松愉快的正视这些肖像呢?他们看起来恐怖、嗜欲、冲动,且处于随时倏忽即逝的感觉。站在这些装着玻璃框,影射着自己身影的肖像作品面前,谁都不愿沉湎其中,但它比任何美丽的表象都更加趋向真实、确定和长久。

 

培根不在乎社会的快乐与否,他唯觉艺术不朽。在生活中,他贪恋食物、美酒、喜爱的人及刺激的事物,在画中也同样印证,他最兴奋、也最深刻的生产美,真实性即最高的美。试想一下,正如道貌岸然、彬彬有礼的上流社会突然闯入一个行为出格、举止粗放但又光明坦荡的培根,所引起的惊慌、不适和趣味一样,培根的画摆在我们的身旁,我们就像看见自己怪物的一瞬,是该为这揭开的秘密羞愧恼怒,大发脾气?还是在濒于兽性时刻努力挣扎?培根,让我们思考:人,这荒谬、可笑又不幸的动物,在虚无主义的路口,当如何对待生命?

 

三 油画棒纸粘贴深入自由的探索

 

1962年,大卫•西尔维斯特在对弗兰西斯•培根访谈中问到:“你作画从不用速写或草图,你从不对画面进行预先演练?”培根回答到:“我常常觉得应该这样做,但我没有。对于我的绘画方式来说,这种方法的作用很小。肌理、色调、颜料的移动方式的确都有意外的结果,导致事先画好的任何速写都只能成为骨架似的东西。”这曾经被当作否定培根画素描的重要理由,但其实从培根的回答我们可以读出的信息更加复杂:一是对于他当时的绘画方式(主要是油画)他很少采用预先素描的方式,因为对于培根来说油画中那种被他称为“机运”的东西非常重要;二是他可能更青睐素描作为独立的作品存在,而不是仅仅为“骨架似”的东西。

关于弗朗西斯•培根是否画素描的论述,艺术史家爱德华•露西-史密斯在他的研究、以及后来流出的大批培根素描收藏已经给出了不用再怀疑的答案。其中,贝瑞•焦尔的素描收藏看起来的确像是培根那些声名卓著的成型油彩作品背后的方法论。

 

让人惊讶的是,培根晚年的一批油画棒纸粘贴,展现出另一番独立自足的探索势头。相比油画作品,常人在惯性上对素描、油画棒色粉、剪贴画等其他材料类作品抱有难以放下的轻视态度。但艺术家好像并不这样想!培根曾表示:“提起埃德加可不要忘了,他最出色的是粉彩。”而且,培根在分析埃德加粉彩中的影像中提到,“埃德加总是用线条从身体贯穿而过”,“而在这之后,他会把大量的色彩添加在线条之间。”他认为这样,影像的真实性被强化,也多方面把真实性给呈现出来;强度也被放入肉体的色彩给撑起来。

 

毫无疑问,培根在晚期的创作中试图吸取这一方法来画头像,以得到更加犀利、更加真实的影像。培根选用油画棒,用利落的圆圈来画人物眼窝,用练达的曲线来画尖叫,线条与线条之间填入如莫奈日出般丰富的色彩。如果说,培根的油彩是在借助“机运”用非图像化扭曲造型释放真实,那么,他的这些油画棒作品则少了偶然,多了规划。

 

培根早就说过,伦勃朗把持非理性记号创造影像,是把抽象表现主义的工作做尽了,比如伦勃朗的《自画像》是非图像的,因为人物的眼窝是没有的。并且伦勃朗还记录了真实,这对于培根更加刺激及深奥。与此同时,培根又说绘画的性质在他看来是二元的,他之所以不感兴趣抽象画在于抽象绘画是纯粹美学的,抽象画中图案和形状的美,才是吸引人的地方。结合培根早期关于绘画的思考,再看培根的这些油画棒作品,不得不让人兴奋的发现,他正是在进行着用最吸引人的抽象图案和形状来达到记录真实的实验。”伟大的艺术都是诞生于巧妙的规划中。(培根 语)”

 

我们甚至有理由相信,他选用拼贴的方式都是为了超越自己曾经成就的一种有意作为。如果仅仅是换一种材料实验,他完全可以用油画棒把整个图像一气呵成。培根的油画作品有一个非常显著的特征便是背景统一、清晰。培根说,大概是因为不喜欢家庭氛围的原因,他喜欢在冷硬的背景上摆放影像的亲密感,把影像孤立起来,让它远离室内及家庭,这样,影像才能够自我表达。那么,比起平涂背景,把影像直接减下来贴在有色卡纸上似乎是更加孤立,也更加决绝的表达。

 

另外,培根也追求一种结构的绘画,为此他放弃了做雕塑的打算。在1973年与大卫•西尔维斯特的访谈中,他曾提到发现一个让绘画呈现出的影像比雕塑更好的方法。还没有付诸实践,但把它们用雕塑的方式思考。他还用了一个罗曼蒂克的形容“那会是一种结构的绘画,影像从肉体的河流浮出水面。”那造型是什么样的?“已经确定它们会从某个结构升起。”……

 

当然,我们无从判断他口中的结构绘画是指这些油画棒纸拼贴。不过,从培根对毕加索立体主义创作的喜爱,与他批判马蒂斯色纸拼贴太过装饰与抒情的态度来看,很容易让人明确培根在进行油画棒纸拼贴创作前是进行了多方面的缜密思考的。

 

培根自己说:“我喜欢符合形式的艺术,真的,从这方面看,也许是年纪越大,我就越想更自由且符合形式的作品。这是另一个难题。”与艺术史家爱德华•露西-史密斯认定培根晚年的素描作品都是怀抱雄心壮志的作品一样,我倾向认为培根的油画棒纸拼贴是在寻找解决“更自由且符合形式”难题的办法,是培根超越自身的一种深入探索。

 

 

结语

艺术的大胆尝试往往是人性欲望或肮脏癖好合法化的试金石,这便是伟大艺术作品始终遭受压制的道德根源。可这不妨碍它们受人欢迎,因为人本身具有渴望毁灭和堕落的一面。弗朗西斯•培根那些具有冲击力的艺术,是他在上帝的惦记与虚无的路程中备受煎熬的产物,他是获得解放的人,以艺术找到生命结实的阶梯。

 

文嘉琳

2021.2.10

Francis Bacon is a great artist. His glory has been shared all over the world, but we only know the tip of the iceberg about him. Francis Bacon, we need and continue to need to know him.

People admire Francis Bacon's art, which is interesting in itself. Is Bacon's birth the creative tension of art? Or are human beings addicted to living under different conditions? Or is "all childishness of God"?

Bacon itself is more like an art open to the world.

 

One — life goes deep into art.

 

Bacon's dependence on art is beyond the understanding of ordinary people, just like a drug addict's dependence on drugs. Art links his nerves, peddles his feelings, and exposes his sex and pleasure. Art is not only the necessary pass for bacon to mix in Soho, but also the experience process of his life existence. As he himself said: "I think modern people will play games for no reason because they know that they are accidental products and worthless individuals Look at the art now, they're all out and out games. I think that's how it is, and what's fascinating is that it's more and more difficult for artists because they have to really go deep into the game to achieve what they want. " Bacon, who has no religious belief, completely dedicates himself to nothingness and thoroughly penetrates his life into the game of art.

 

Bacon described his life as a huge mess: when he was expelled by middle-class families at the age of 16 because of disguise, and abandoned by his uncle in Berlin Hotel, he was completely reduced to the life of close men (or, perhaps more accurately, gay male prostitutes) and gamblers Bacon, after meeting Eric hall, was really serious about painting and broadened his artistic vision under Hall's guidance. Art is like bacon's straw!

 

The end of the two world wars forced human beings to find a new way out of exhaustion, secular life replaced the grand theme, and art returned to the individual theme. What dominates artistic creation is no longer lofty taste and ultimate sentiment, but a complete individual expression. First of all, Bacon's art relies on an instinct to expose emotional violence, distorted images and private life in his works and Salon Exhibition Hall. Bacon tears off the virtue mask of life and presents the weak nature of human nature.

Bacon is fortunate to be more than Oscar Wilde, who can release himself without grace and grace. Bacon's art and legend are closely linked to his two same-sex lovers, one of whom is a bloody pilot (and a full alcoholic), and a burglar who is running in the east end of London. These people who were rejected by the secular world are not only the characters in Bacon's life, but also his art source. At the 1962 Tete painting exhibition in London, where bacon art achieved key achievements, his lover Peter Lessey committed suicide in the Mediterranean the same day; at the 1971 Paris Review exhibition, his lover George Dale committed suicide on the night before the exhibition opened. Bacon's unprecedented depravity and indulgence is the true portrait of the post-war Europeans. 

 

He indulges in the bloody obsession on the canvas, the nature of violence, the cruelty of life and the limit of challenging ethics, which is exactly the pain and excitement of modern people. No perfect civilization will be found in any historical period, nor is man a pure virtue slave. Only by expanding moral standards can human beings exist.There is no doubt that each of us has a mysterious impulse to tear ourselves apart, but most of us can only taste the joy of bloodthirsty quietly through great creation and other people's lives. As bacon himself very clear "about the tragic experience of love and disease, after all, is not liked by people, they prefer to be nothing at the side of the crowd." Bacon lived a chaotic and wrong life all his life. He did not hesitate to use himself as a material, and achieved bold practice of art in the excitement of repeated trials and pleasures.

 

Two—Art goes deep into human nature

 

Starting from Bacon's signature work "three character exercises based on the crucifixion map", he made a decision to use this as the middle line to express the tragedy of human nature with a half human and half animal monster. As a kind of preaching story, the traditional theme of "nailing" is full of the lofty sense of sacrifice for human beings in the works of artists in the past. "It protects your feelings and moods like armor" (bacon language). Human beings commit themselves to a world of ideas to escape the cruel reality and personal distress. Bacon said that "crucifixion" was an atrocity of human beings. He put up the cross, on which the flesh, blood and beast were hanging naked, clearing the religious significance. At the same time, Bacon's works stimulated the nerves of human beings, hiding the deep uneasiness of fate.

 

Modern people are faced with an enigmatic paradox: on the one hand, the collapse of idealism, religion and super-morality, and the end of nihilism. Obviously bacon would not be a prophet, a saint, a prophet, nor would he actively create decorative anesthetics for the purpose of self deception. He is more and more firmly addicted to capture the mysterious nature of the characters around him, the indecent state of sitting on the toilet, the deformed face during the lavatory, the bloody naked syringe, the mean of male intercourse Bacon refreshes everything, liberates himself from instinct, does not improve morality, and beautifies his desire On the stage of civilization, which is enveloped with the atmosphere of purification, Bacon's art goes deep into the essence of human beings.

 

Since the 1960s, bacon has been more and more inclined to paint portraits. He thinks that art is the infatuation of life, and what human beings are infatuated with most is themselves. His portraits mostly depict the people around him, although they are always different from their own appearance. Who can face up to these portraits with ease? They look terrible, lustful, impulsive, and in a sense of fleeting at any time. Standing in front of these portraits with glass frames and reflecting their own figures, no one wants to indulge in them, but it tends to be more real, definite and lasting than any beautiful appearance.

Bacon doesn't care whether the society is happy or not. He only thinks that art is immortal. In his life, he is greedy for food, wine, favorite people and exciting things, which is also confirmed in his paintings. His most exciting and profound production of beauty is authenticity, which is the highest beauty. Just imagine the panic, discomfort and interest caused by Bacon's rude but bright and magnanimous behavior. Bacon's paintings are placed beside us. It's like the moment when we see our own monsters. Should we be ashamed, angry and angry for the secret? Or struggling hard at the moment of being on the verge of beast? Bacon, let's think: man, this ridiculous, ridiculous and unfortunate animal, how to treat life at the intersection of nihilism?

 

Three—The exploration of stick paper pasting in oil painting

 

In 1962, David Silvestre asked in an interview with Francis Bacon, "you never sketch or sketch, you never rehearse the picture?" Bacon replied, "I often feel like I should, but I don't. For my way of painting, this method has little effect. Texture, hue, and the way pigments move all have unexpected results. As a result, any sketch drawn in advance can only become a skeleton like thing. " This was once regarded as an important reason to deny Bacon's drawing, but in fact, the information we can read from Bacon's answer is more complex: first, he seldom used the way of pre drawing for his painting style (mainly oil painting) at that time, because for bacon, the kind of thing he called "opportunity" in oil painting is very important; second, he may prefer drawing as an independent way Li's works exist, not just for "skeleton like" things.

 

As to whether Francis Bacon drew sketches or not, art historian Edward Lucy Smith, in his research and later a large number of Bacon's collection of sketches, has given the answer that need not be doubted. Among them, Barry Joel's sketch collection really looks like the methodology behind Bacon's famous shaped oil painting works.

 

Surprisingly, a group of oil paintings pasted with stick paper in Bacon's later years showed another independent and self-sufficient exploration momentum. Compared with oil paintings, ordinary people have a hard to put down attitude towards sketch, oil painting stick toner, clip art and other material works. But artists don't seem to think so! Bacon once said: "when you talk about Edgar, don't forget that his best work is pastel." Moreover, bacon mentioned in his analysis of the images in Edgar's pastels that "Edgar always runs through his body with lines" and "after that, he will add a lot of colors between the lines." He thinks that in this way, the authenticity of the image is strengthened, and the authenticity is presented in many ways; the intensity is also put into the color of the body to prop up.

 

There is no doubt that Bacon tried to draw the head image by using this method in his later creation to get more sharp and real images. Bacon chooses oil painting stick, draws the eyes of characters with sharp circles, screams with the curves of practice, and fills lines with rich colors like the sunrise of Monet. If Bacon's oil painting is releasing reality with the aid of "machine transport" and non image distortion, then his paintings are less accidental and more planned.

 

Bacon has long said that Rembrandt's control of irrational signs to create images is to do all the work of abstract expressionism. For example, Rembrandt's self portrait is non image, because there is no eye socket. And Rembrandt also records the truth, which is more exciting and profound for bacon. At the same time, bacon also said that the nature of painting is binary in his view. The reason why he is not interested in abstract painting is that abstract painting is purely aesthetic, and the beauty of patterns and shapes in abstract painting is the attraction. Combined with Bacon's early thinking about painting, and looking at his oil painting stick works, we can't help but find that he is doing the experiment of recording reality with the most attractive abstract patterns and shapes. " Great art is born in ingenious planning. (Bacon)

 

We even have reason to believe that he chose collage in order to surpass his achievements. If it's just another kind of material experiment, he can completely complete the whole image with an oil painting stick. Bacon's oil paintings have a very significant feature that the background is unified and clear. Bacon said that probably because he didn't like the family atmosphere, he liked the intimacy of putting the image on the cold and hard background, isolating the image and keeping it away from the room and family, so that the image could express itself. Then, compared with the flat background, it seems more isolated and decisive to cut down the image and paste it on the color card paper.

 

Bacon also pursued a kind of structural painting, so he gave up his plan to make sculpture. In an interview with David silverwell in 1973, he mentioned finding a way to make the image of a painting better than sculpture. It has not been put into practice, but they are thought in a sculpture way. He also described it as "a structural painting, with images floating out of the river of the body." What is the shape of that? "It has been determined that they will rise from a structure."... "

 

Of course, we have no way to judge that the structural painting in his words refers to the stick paper collage of these oil paintings. However, from Bacon's love of Picasso's Cubism and his criticism of Matisse's color paper collage as too decorative and lyrical, it is easy to make it clear that bacon had made careful thinking in many aspects before he created oil painting stick paper collage.

 

Bacon himself said, "I like formal art. Really, from this point of view, maybe the older I get, the more I want more free and formal works. That's another problem. " Just as art historian Edward Lucy Smith believes that Bacon's sketches in his later years are all ambitious works, I tend to think that Bacon's stick and paper collage of oil paintings is a way to solve the problem of "freer and more in line with the form", and a deep exploration of bacon beyond himself.

 

Epilogue

 

The bold attempt of art is often the touchstone of legalization of human desire or dirty habit, which is the moral root of the suppression of great art works. But this does not prevent them from being popular, because people themselves have a desire for destruction and degradation. Francis Bacon's art of impact is the product of his suffering in the journey of God's thoughts and nihility. He is the liberated man who finds a solid ladder of life by art.